Shop Forum More Submit  Join Login
Occupy Wall Street 53 by Radio-Schizo Occupy Wall Street 53 by Radio-Schizo
Sign at Zuccotti Park - Occupy Wall Street protests, October 9th, 2011.
Add a Comment:
Chris-You-ng Featured By Owner Oct 10, 2016
Corporations are groups of people. In order to be held accountable for checks and contracts they are part of, they are legally regarded as people. A group of people. If you sign a contract for a mobile phone service, pay for it but do not receive the service you were guaranteed in the contract, who should be held responsible? The logo? The paper you signed? The building the corporation does business out of or the PEOPLE that work for and ARE the corporation? "Occupy Wall Street" was no more or less a person than the corporations it ignorantly protested. Every modern convenience the ows fools enjoyed was made possible by corporations. All of it. Extremely stupid. Fucking bizarre. And if you're against the death penalty then you'll have to stop the behavior that makes it a necessity. Are you also against the torture and brutal murder committed by those who are executed? Please, protest all forms of crime. That should take care of all of our problems. Hey! Protest your own ignorant stupidity! Even better. Problem solved. You're welcome. 
The-Darkwolf Featured By Owner Oct 30, 2015
God knows there's no shortage of corporations who are mentally challenged....
JangoFettX Featured By Owner May 11, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Yet another reason why we need the death penalty. Good job.
SAnneM Featured By Owner Apr 23, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Ha ha. Good one.
germanvisitor Featured By Owner Jan 14, 2012
We will establish justice when they start to fear us.
That's a pity.
We prefer respect.
counterculturesite Featured By Owner Nov 7, 2011
I am doing a spread on occupy on my site and would like to use this. Let me know if interested. Thanks.
Radio-Schizo Featured By Owner Nov 7, 2011
Sure! Please feel free to use the photo! :)
counterculturesite Featured By Owner Nov 10, 2011
Here is the link [link] thanks for letting me use your work
cerisepuck Featured By Owner Nov 3, 2011
Thankyou for supporting the 99
FracturedxPorcelain Featured By Owner Oct 27, 2011  Professional Photographer
That is fucking awesome.
LightChild Featured By Owner Oct 25, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
Bwaha, nice. I agree.
RichardWillis Featured By Owner Oct 21, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
Well this one is mind numbing for me, because it goes both ways in my mind. The basic idea behind having corporations, by itself, is rather fair. It allows a group of people or just one or two to form a company that doesn't completely destroy the individual owners should it fail. As the son of a small business owner I see this fair because the risks of trying to start are extremely hazardous to your health, credit rating, name, and otherwise life. I mean did you know if the business is not incorporated the owners personal finances and the businesses are the same? I don't know about you but I don't think it's possible to sleep at night if your business goes over 20 employees in that situation. Basically it reads like you personally responsible for 20 families. You still are even incorporated, but at least you don't have to be publicly.

That said when they get to big, I understand your problem. I hate GE and Time-Warner with a passion I can not begin to explain.

If you or anyone has a solution for a happy medium I would be overjoyed to hear it. Please consider putting this one in The Thinkers group.
gerundium Featured By Owner Oct 25, 2011
in this economic rame-work, makgin the workers part of it, like radio-schizo outlined, is that happy medium (if i understood the term happy medium) - people being share-holders of what holds a share of their life. and preferrably, only them. not some anonymous interest group that recklessly and ignorantly executes pressure to force short-sighted efficiency. apart from short-term profits, that only generates stress for the involved staff and the corporation itself, risking the health of both.

a positive example that shows how much can be achieved, how much creativity and productivity this generates is how the original amiga company was structured when they developed their prototype.
Radio-Schizo Featured By Owner Oct 22, 2011
You're from the Thinkers Group? Well that explains why you debate intelligently.

The day I snapped this pic I was staying overnight at Zuccotti Park (I wasn't camping, btw, since I live only 20 minutes from Wall St., I stayed up all night talking to people), but anyways I was talking to a friend of mine about corporations, and we both agreed on a few points on what makes for a good corporation.

I believe that yes, it is fair to bring in some investors, shareholders, and others in when a business gets large enough to help manage and share some responsibility. But keep the greed under control.

Corporations can benefit people greatly if they actually make their workers part of it, instead of keeping them as worker drones. Let me explain: If a corporation were to take the inflated salaries of CEO's and other higher-ups, and instead share it amongst workers, it would make it not only more solid, but it would actually help the economy. Say a corporation does extremely well and makes millions a year, use that money to increase worker benefits, salaries for everyone. Employees would actually want to work harder to increase profits because they would all directly benefit from it. Their efficiency and loyalty would skyrocket. Kinda like a collective. Make it more than a corporation, make it a social institution where profit goes to better people's lives in a certain area. It doesn't have to be that much, just enough to share some of the wealth and give outstanding employees a little extra for their effort. CEO's and owners would naturally get a larger salary, why not? They keep the machine well-oiled and running. But not so much that they're taking a bite out of everyone else's slice.

But instead you have these CEO's, Presidents, Managers, etc, making astronomical amounts that no human would ever be able to spend in a lifetime, while they keep their employees at minimum wage, the only reward being a coffee mug and a chance at not getting fired when they start lining people up for the chopping block. Thats when a corporation stops being a human institution and starts being a plantation, paying everyone just enough to barely afford food and shelter. In other words, slavery.
RichardWillis Featured By Owner Oct 25, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
I have seen what you are talking about in reality. There was a sign company I toured that had open books to the employees. All the high moral that you are talking about is there. The only catch was in order to get hired you had to have a college degree and become a shareholder which is a grand idea. Generally people with a higher education understand what being a shareholder is about. But what about the custodians and other positions you would not need a degree in? Well those ended up being contracted from a cleaning service.

So what am I getting at? Simple: This type of motivation does not work with everyone.

Let's say I owned a meat packing company that basically required cheap labor to cut cost enough to make it where Wal-Mart would buy my stuff and not the other guy's. If I opened the books to individuals that make $7.25, and lets say they were not the smartest cookies in the box (drank on weekends, beat their wife, kick there dog), I would find it very hard to explain any difference in salary at all. Then there is the whole privacy issue.

What if the company took a major loss and I had to pay salaries on a credit card one month (that happens all the time in the small business world and we don't ask for bailouts, we just get out of it). These hell-raiser type of people would not know how to respond constructively. As an owner I could have a major mess. Instead of calming down long enough to let me figure out a solution, I could have the financials yelled out down the street causing public worry; riots being started in the plant; and the worst possibility: People quitting by the dozen. Without employees there is no product: no product, no business; no business, no company; no company, no jobs.

You folks have to remember what ever new laws you make for the big guys affects the small ones as well.
theSaltShaker Featured By Owner Oct 24, 2011
Yes! Damn straight. When employees get paid only a set wage (a none too generous set wage) while every cent of profits immediately get siphoned off by the CEOs etc, well, they have a way of losing motivation.
Radio-Schizo Featured By Owner Oct 24, 2011
And that, my friend, is when revolutions start.
MangoSundae Featured By Owner Oct 19, 2011
:iconthumbsupplz: Good one!!!
MunkiiC Featured By Owner Oct 17, 2011  Student Digital Artist
well said.
holly-m-moore Featured By Owner Oct 17, 2011  Student Digital Artist
Not a fan of the death penalty, but I found this hilarious! :XD:
avfc4me Featured By Owner Oct 15, 2011
Hadn't thought of it quite that way; thanks for the giggle.
autogestion Featured By Owner Oct 13, 2011  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
so ironic
thanks =]
Add a Comment:


Submitted on
October 11, 2011
Image Size
4.9 MB


1,307 (1 today)
60 (who?)

Camera Data

Canon EOS 50D
Shutter Speed
1/64 second
Focal Length
41 mm
ISO Speed
Date Taken
Oct 9, 2011, 8:41:30 AM
EF28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Sensor Size